Closed skogard closed 1 year ago
I don't think the protocol supports it, but it is something we probably track and can expose. @mbommerez mind if someone from the team chimes in?
@dchoi27 We don't keep old records with their sequence number in the database, so this is not something we can support at the moment.
Just curious if the protocol itself has this feature built in, or if I want to keep track of all the history I have to keep track of them separately.
Currently, calling:
gives us the latest version of the name resolution, but I notice that the resolved name includes sequence numbers. This made me curious if there's a way to do something like:
and get the resolution at certain point in time in the past. If this is not possible with the underlying protocol and I have to build my own data structure that's fine too. Just want to make sure that I am not building some bolt-on technology when the protocol natively supports it.
Thanks in advance!