We don't have Git conventions defined in this repository and they may lead to:
Having discussions on the same topics over and over.
Having discussions of different approaches where none of them are wrong and it's a matter of personal tastes.
Ending up having a not neat Git commit history.
The purpose of this issue is to discuss different approaches to working with Git and reach a consensus to establish some conventions for not having the issues listed above.
At least we should agree on:
Git commit message conventions.
Git merge strategies.
Who is responsible to merge an approved commit / PR?
We don't have Git conventions defined in this repository and they may lead to:
The purpose of this issue is to discuss different approaches to working with Git and reach a consensus to establish some conventions for not having the issues listed above.
At least we should agree on: