Closed ferristocrat closed 6 months ago
@ferristocrat can you refine this roadmap item and work with Tome on the UX/UI part? and work with Artur to determine if anything on the edge services needs to be updated.
The satellite team recently implemented: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5879 Which changes how the placement settings work on the satellite side for accounts, projects and buckets.
My notes:
This task involves work that will touch code owned by the Satellite team. We may need to consult/work with them to do the metainfo-side work. That stuff can actually be worked on in parallel with the other tasks, which could speed up development.
Work | Details | Story Point Estimation |
---|---|---|
DB work | add field for region to bucket_metainfos |
2 sp |
Metainfo work | if new field is set to NA or EU for a bucket, uploads are restricted to that region | 3 sp |
UI work | functionality to create bucket with region is implemented on backend. UI for bucket creation updated | 3 sp |
Personal ROM estimation: 2-3 sprints (the actual coding should be small, but this should account for QA/Design/Product feedback throughout implementation
closing this issue in favor of https://github.com/storj/roadmap-private/issues/84
Background
Currently, all buckets are global by default, which may not be optimal for certain use cases and can result in slower performance for users in certain regions. Providing users with the option to choose between global, region-specific buckets or groups of nodes can improve their experience and even enable new customers to use Storj.
Problem Statement
As a Storj user, I want to be able to choose between a global bucket and region-specific buckets upon creation so that I can prioritize either global durability or regional performance for my uploads and downloads based on my specific needs.
OR
As a Storj user, I want to be able to choose a satellite-defined group of nodes when creating a bucket so that I can store my data on nodes that have a specific certification or meet a specific business requirement. For example, a group of nodes could be in SOC2-certified facilities.
Why do customers care about having this choice?
Region: Choosing a specific region can offer better performance, lower latency, and potentially lower costs for data transfers within that region. However, region-specific buckets might have slightly lower durability compared to global buckets due to being restricted to a single region.
Global: On the other hand, global buckets provide high durability and global access to the data at the cost of potentially slower performance, especially for users in regions far from the data storage nodes. Global buckets are suitable for use cases where data availability across different regions is more important than performance.
Group:
Scenarios
Requirements
Assumptions
Acceptance Criteria
Success Metrics
Out of Scope
Open Discussion