Closed mniewrzal closed 2 years ago
Commented by Brandon Iglesias
s3 does not have atomic server-side rename/ move. This means we could extend the gateway to support this feature but it would be an extension to the gateway that is NOT s3 compatible.
Commented by John Gleeson
As long as it doesn’t break backwards compatibility but extends the capability of our system, that’s a good thing.
Already implemented
Atomic server-side rename for a single object at a time is understood and we have a path towards implementation.
Example:
folder/demo/object.mp4
into to:
folder/demo/myobject.mp4
or
folder/myobject.mp4
Blueprint: [https://review.dev.storj.io/c/storj/storj/+/4323/9/docs/blueprints/server-side-rename.md#9|https://review.dev.storj.io/c/storj/storj/+/4323/9/docs/blueprints/server-side-rename.md#9]
Migrated from https://storjlabs.atlassian.net/browse/PG-213