storybookjs / storybook

Storybook is the industry standard workshop for building, documenting, and testing UI components in isolation
https://storybook.js.org
MIT License
84.66k stars 9.32k forks source link

Storybook with builder-webpac5 complains about conflicting values in DefinePlugin and not redefine custom variables #14257

Closed khats closed 3 years ago

khats commented 3 years ago

Describe the bug I am using Storybook6-rc01 with builder-webpack5. I define several variables with patching webpack config and DefinePlugin through function webpackFinal:

plugins: [
      new webpack.DefinePlugin({
      "process.env.NODE_ENV": JSON.stringify("development"),
      "window.FAKE_GLOBAL_FUNCTION": "(function() { return false; })",
    }),
],

Function FAKE_GLOBAL_FUNCTION call is added to test story

But there is error about Conflicting values for 'process.env' in build console and there is error on rendered story on UI about window.FAKE_GLOBAL_FUNCTION is not defined

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to https://github.com/khats/storybook-demo
  2. Pull project
  3. Install dependencies with yarn
  4. Start storybook with yarn start-storybook

Expected behavior

  1. No error in build console: Conflicting values for 'process.env' '{NODE_ENV: "development", NODE_PATH: [], STORYBOOK: "true", PUBLIC_URL: "."}' !== '{}'
  2. window. FAKE_GLOBAL_FUNCTION is defined and story is rendered without error

Screenshots

image

image

Code snippets If applicable, add code samples to help explain your problem.

System Environment Info:

System: OS: macOS 11.0.1 CPU: (12) x64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz Binaries: Node: 14.15.3 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v14.15.3/bin/node Yarn: 2.4.0 - /usr/local/bin/yarn npm: 6.14.9 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v14.15.3/bin/npm Browsers: Chrome: 89.0.4389.90 Firefox: 76.0.1 Safari: 14.0.1

Additional context Add any other context about the problem here.

┆Issue is synchronized with this Asana task by Unito

shilman commented 3 years ago

I took a look at the repo:

MMBP15:storybook-demo shilman$ yarn why webpack
yarn why v1.22.10
[1/4] πŸ€”  Why do we have the module "webpack"...?
[2/4] 🚚  Initialising dependency graph...
[3/4] πŸ”  Finding dependency...
[4/4] 🚑  Calculating file sizes...
=> Found "webpack@4.46.0"
info Has been hoisted to "webpack"
info Reasons this module exists
   - Hoisted from "@storybook#react#webpack"
   - Hoisted from "@storybook#builder-webpack5#@storybook#core-common#webpack"
   - Hoisted from "@storybook#addon-essentials#@storybook#addon-docs#@storybook#builder-webpack4#webpack"
   - Hoisted from "@storybook#react#@storybook#core#@storybook#core-server#webpack"
info Disk size without dependencies: "5.21MB"
info Disk size with unique dependencies: "11.82MB"
info Disk size with transitive dependencies: "31.31MB"
info Number of shared dependencies: 122
=> Found "@storybook/builder-webpack5#webpack@5.26.2"
info This module exists because "@storybook#builder-webpack5" depends on it.
info Disk size without dependencies: "5MB"
info Disk size with unique dependencies: "9.96MB"
info Disk size with transitive dependencies: "26.17MB"
info Number of shared dependencies: 97
✨  Done in 0.95s.

The issue is that webpack4 is hoisted, but because you're using builder-webpack5, this code is executing using a webpack4 instance of DefinePlugin, that's being executed inside webpack5:

const patchWebpackConfig = async (defaultConfig, options) => {
  return mergeConfigs(defaultConfig, {
    stats: "detailed",
    resolve: {},
    plugins: [
      new webpack.DefinePlugin({
        "process.env.NODE_ENV": JSON.stringify("development"),
        "window.FAKE_GLOBAL_FUNCTION": "(function() { return false; })",
      }),
    ],
  });
};

I installed webpack5 at the root to force it to be hoisted:

yarn add webpack@5.26.2 --dev

However that leads to a different error.

azvfx commented 3 years ago

We are experiencing this issue as well, however it's hit and miss, sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't. Our project has to use Yarn dependency resolution for webpack 5, it may have something to do with that as some parts of storybook is still using webpack 4.

VincentLanglet commented 3 years ago

I also experience the issue

WARN Unexpected webpack version in manager-builder
WARN - Received: 5.32.0
WARN - Expected: 4.x
WARN 
WARN For more info: https://gist.github.com/shilman/8856ea1786dcd247139b47b270912324#troubleshooting
WARNING in DefinePlugin
Conflicting values for 'process.env'

With

module.exports = {
    stories: ['../client/stories/**/*.stories.js'],
    addons: [
        '@storybook/addon-actions/register',
        {
            name: '@storybook/addon-postcss',
            options: {
                postcssLoaderOptions: {
                    implementation: require('postcss'),
                },
            },
        },
    ],
    core: {
        builder: 'webpack5',
    },
};

and the conflict resolution

    "resolutions": {
        "css-loader": "^5.0.0",
        "dotenv-webpack": "^7.0.0",
        "html-webpack-plugin": "^5.0.0",
        "style-loader": "^2.0.0",
        "terser-webpack-plugin": "^5.0.0",
        "webpack": "^5.24.0",
        "webpack-dev-middleware": "^4.1.0",
        "webpack-virtual-modules": "^0.4.2"
    },

But the storybook seems to work even with this warning

alexbchr commented 3 years ago

I have the same issue as well, Storybook works nonetheless, but the live reload is not working when doing edits to components. I need to manually refresh the Storybook webpage in order to see my changes.

dontsave commented 3 years ago

we are running into this issue as well when using yarn resolutions for webpack 5 in our workspaces monorepo

jqrun commented 3 years ago

Is this because of: https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/blob/75e2b73964dab1e10576ad6b43fbb4f5bf0e3640/lib/core-server/src/manager/manager-webpack.config.ts#L109?

According to the Webpack docs, one should avoid overriding upper-level portions of process: https://webpack.js.org/plugins/define-plugin/.

tourze commented 3 years ago

same problem

rbatsenko commented 3 years ago

Hey guys, I was able to overcome the build warning issue with the solution from this thread: https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/issues/6763#issuecomment-491415516

Like this:

config.plugins = [
  ...config.plugins.filter((plugin) => !plugin.definitions),
  new webpack.DefinePlugin({
    "process.env.NODE_ENV": JSON.stringify(
      configType === "DEVELOPMENT" ? "development" : "production"
    ),
    "process.env.NODE_PATH": JSON.stringify([]),
    "process.env.STORYBOOK": JSON.stringify('true'),
    "process.env.PUBLIC_PATH": JSON.stringify("."),
  })
];

πŸ’ͺ

ritchieanesco commented 3 years ago

@rbatsenko suggestion doesn't work if you run --no-manager-cache. Would this mean its related to manager-webpack5? I'm lost for ideas as most solutions are very similar.

rbatsenko commented 3 years ago

@ritchieanesco interesting πŸ€” I don't have time to investigate now, maybe you can try to ask Webpack guys

ritchieanesco commented 3 years ago

Thought i'd document more of my findings... the warning goes away once the build is cached when running start-storybook. Just to be clear i'm not redefining the process.env as per comment

The warning still appears when you run build-storybook.

package.json @storybook/addon-actions: "^6.3.0-alpha.31" @storybook/addon-essentials: "^6.3.0-alpha.31" @storybook/addon-links: "^6.3.0-alpha.31" @storybook/addon-svelte-csf: "^1.0.0", @storybook/builder-webpack5: "^6.3.0-alpha.31" @storybook/manager-webpack5: "^6.3.0-alpha.41" @storybook/svelte: "^6.3.0-alpha.31" dotenv-webpack: "^7.0.2" webpack: "^5.37.0" webpack-cli: "^4.7.0" webpack-dev-server: "^3.11.2"

shilman commented 3 years ago

@ritchieanesco

Try upgrading to the latest prerelease:

npx sb@next upgrade --prerelease

Does that fix it?

gertsonderby commented 3 years ago

@ritchieanesco

Try upgrading to the latest prerelease:

npx sb@next upgrade --prerelease

Does that fix it?

I just experienced this error with beta 10.

shilman commented 3 years ago

@gertsonderby did you try installing webpack5 as a project dev dependency?

Jispry commented 3 years ago

still present in beta.10 even with webpack 5.x in dev dependencies.

when running start-storybook --smoke-test fails

adding does however have slight effect

config.plugins = [
      ...config.plugins.filter(plugin => !plugin.definitions),
      new webpack.DefinePlugin({
        'process.env.NODE_ENV': JSON.stringify(configType === 'DEVELOPMENT' ? 'development' : 'production'),
        'process.env.NODE_PATH': JSON.stringify([]),
        'process.env.STORYBOOK': JSON.stringify('true'),
        'process.env.PUBLIC_PATH': JSON.stringify('.')
      })
    ];

with it

preview (webpack 5.38.1) compiled with 2 warnings in 28721 ms
WARN manager: [object Object]
WARN preview: [object Object],[object Object]

without it

WARNING in DefinePlugin
Conflicting values for 'process.env'
'{NODE_ENV: "development", NODE_PATH: [], STORYBOOK: "true", PUBLIC_URL: "."}' !== '{}'

preview (webpack 5.38.1) compiled with 4 warnings in 31451 ms
WARN manager: [object Object]
WARN preview: [object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
gertsonderby commented 3 years ago

@gertsonderby did you try installing webpack5 as a project dev dependency?

I'm working with the prereleases specifically because we use Webpack 5.

shilman commented 3 years ago

@gertsonderby not all projects that use webpack5 have webpack as a direct project dependency. sometimes it's hidden beneath NextJS/Angular/etc. indirectly and NPM/Yarn hoisting can mess things up. having it as a project dep forces webpack5 to be hoisted. If it's not hoisted properly, this DefinePlugin error shows up.

gertsonderby commented 3 years ago

@gertsonderby not all projects that use webpack5 have webpack as a direct project dependency.

Fair enough, and apologies if I came off snippy. And to clarify, webpack is a direct dependency in the projects I've seen this happen in.

ritchieanesco commented 3 years ago

@gertsonderby i'm on v6.3.0-beta.10 and still getting the warning.

Screen Shot 2021-06-04 at 7 46 21 am

shilman commented 3 years ago

Can somebody please create a reproduction by running npx sb@next repro, following the instructions, and linking it in your issue description? We prioritize issues with reproductions over those without. Thank you! πŸ™

khats commented 3 years ago

@shilman i have updated original linked project to 6.3-beta.10

jdelStrother commented 3 years ago

In case another reproduction is useful - https://github.com/jdelStrother/conflicting-process-env

Not sure if relevant, but it seems like the process.env error is sometimes only reproducible when using start-storybook --smoke-test. At least, that what I was finding while narrowing down that reproduction ... until right at the end when I deleted yarn.lock & node_modules and reinstalled, at which point I could reproduce the error with or without --smoke-test πŸ˜–

Jispry commented 3 years ago

In case another reproduction is useful - https://github.com/jdelStrother/conflicting-process-env

Not sure if relevant, but it seems like the process.env error is sometimes only reproducible when using start-storybook --smoke-test. At least, that what I was finding while narrowing down that reproduction ... until right at the end when I deleted yarn.lock & node_modules and reinstalled, at which point I could reproduce the error with or without --smoke-test πŸ˜–

yep, this was kinda mentioned already in this comment #850037904 above

thutinavaneethreddy commented 3 years ago

Hey everyone, is there any temporary work around for this issue?

npc-allanb commented 3 years ago

Also looking for work around for this issue.

dewinterjack commented 3 years ago

Removing the yarn resolutions removed the error on build-storybook and storybook however I am still having an issue with process not being defined

Jispry commented 3 years ago

additionally when running build-storybook the task gets stuck and never finish, even though the files are created in storybook-static folder

zerocewl commented 3 years ago

Removing the yarn resolutions removed the error on build-storybook and storybook however I am still having an issue with process not being defined

@dewinterjack Have you solved the error?

I tried to add process/browser as suggested here to storybooks main.js, but without any luck.

const webpack = require('webpack')

module.exports = {
...
    config.plugins.push(
      new webpack.ProvidePlugin({
        process: 'process/browser',
      })
    );
WalterWeidner commented 3 years ago

I have the same issue as well, Storybook works nonetheless, but the live reload is not working when doing edits to components. I need to manually refresh the Storybook webpage in order to see my changes.

We're also seeing this behavior in our private repository (using builder-webpack5). We have Webpack 5.38.1 as a direct dependency at the root of our repository (no fancy monorepo setup here).

This is the config as it comes through storybook's main.js:

{
  ...
  DefinePlugin {
    definitions: { 'process.env': [Object], NODE_ENV: '"development"' }
  },
  ...
  DefinePlugin { definitions: { 'process.env': '{}' } },
  ....
}

I was seeing stuff from our .env file in the second define plugin and removed the file to see if it would go away completely but I was left with the empty object. We're not even using the .env as this part of the build so it seems something in Storybook is picking up our .env file.

shilman commented 3 years ago

@WalterWeidner please give 6.4.0-alpha.0 a try which should fix the problem when there's no .env file. If that works, I'll patch it back to 6.3.x.

npx sb upgrade --prerelease
WalterWeidner commented 3 years ago

@shilman the empty define plugin doesn't exist any more in 6.4.0-alpha.0 but I still get that warning about process.env.

I was adding my own define like so:

        config.plugins = [
            ...config.plugins,
            new DefinePlugin({
                IS_DEV: configType === 'DEVELOPMENT',
            }),
        ];

but I removed it and still got the warning (even after clearing _nodemodules/.cache).

shilman commented 3 years ago

@WalterWeidner did you even get the warning when you removed your .env file?

WalterWeidner commented 3 years ago

Yes. I still get the warning without the .env file. I've completely removed the file for now (the .env file is only used for a separate CLI tool that doesn't touch Storybook) to remove it from the equation.

jogelin commented 3 years ago

@shilman Same here, I played with 6.4.0-alpha.0 yesterday and still have the waning without .env file.

Jispry commented 3 years ago

still present, i just tested with 6.4.0-alpha.1

jdelStrother commented 3 years ago

I've updated my demo repo here with 6.4.0-alpha.1 - https://github.com/jdelStrother/conflicting-process-env

It still emits a process.env warning during build, and causes yarn start-storybook --smoke-test to fail entirely.

(The latter is the more frustrating bit for me: I can ignore the warning, but we use the smoke-test check in our tests, and the process.env warning causes our CI to fail...)

shilman commented 3 years ago

Yee-haw!! I just released https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/releases/tag/v6.4.0-alpha.2 containing PR #15365 that references this issue. Upgrade today to the @next NPM tag to try it out!

npx sb upgrade --prerelease

Closing this issue. Please re-open if you think there's still more to do.

stefan-schweiger commented 3 years ago

@shilman the error is now gone for me, thank you very much :) Are you planing on patching this back to 6.3?

shilman commented 3 years ago

@stefan-schweiger yup, will patch back in a day or two!

WalterWeidner commented 3 years ago

@shilman the warning is gone for me as well.

One of the other issues, mentioned by someone else in this ticket, was about the hot update not working. That's the issue that is really what we were hoping to get fixed. We thought the warning could maybe be related but it sounds like it isn't?

This is the error we see in the console: image

stefan-schweiger commented 3 years ago

@WalterWeidner for me the hot reload is working fine now again with 6.4.0-alpha.2, so I think this actually should have been related?

WalterWeidner commented 3 years ago

I just removed my _nodemodules/ folder so there shouldn't be a cache problem, reinstalled, and ran start-storybook but the problem still persists. Also, deleted yarn.lock and re-installed my node_modules and that didn't make any difference.

These are what I have configured as dev dependencies currently:

{
    "@storybook/addon-actions": "6.4.0-alpha.2",
    "@storybook/addon-essentials": "6.4.0-alpha.2",
    "@storybook/addon-links": "6.4.0-alpha.2",
    "@storybook/builder-webpack5": "6.4.0-alpha.2",
    "@storybook/manager-webpack5": "6.4.0-alpha.2",
    "@storybook/react": "6.4.0-alpha.2",
    "@storybook/theming": "6.4.0-alpha.2",
    "@testing-library/react-hooks": "^3.4.1",
    "@types/classnames": "2.2.6",
    "@types/dompurify": "2.0.1",
    "@types/enzyme": "3.10.5",
    "@types/jest": "26.0.14",
    "@types/jquery": "3.5.1",
    "@types/lodash": "4.14.161",
    "@types/luxon": "1.25.1",
    "@types/node": "13.7.0",
    "@types/react": "16.9.19",
    "@types/react-modal": "3.10.6",
    "@types/react-router-dom": "^5.1.7",
    "@types/react-test-renderer": "16.9.3",
    "@types/sinon": "7.5.1",
    "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "4.2.0",
    "@typescript-eslint/parser": "4.2.0",
    "babel-loader": "8.2.2",
    "babel-plugin-add-react-displayname": "^0.0.5",
    "babel-plugin-class-name": "zeddidragon/babel-plugin-class-name#a25cb60",
    "babel-plugin-export-toplevel": "^1.0.0",
    "babel-plugin-lodash": "^3.3.4",
    "babel-plugin-preval": "^4.0.0",
    "babel-plugin-react-require": "^3.1.3",
    "babel-plugin-rewire-ts": "^1.3.3",
    "babel-plugin-transform-rename-import": "2.3.0",
    "chalk": "^4.1.0",
    "cli-spinners": "^2.3.0",
    "commander": "^5.0.0",
    "core-js": "^3.6.5",
    "cross-env": "^7.0.2",
    "css-loader": "5.2.6",
    "date-fns": "^2.17.0",
    "del": "^6.0.0",
    "dotenv": "^8.2.0",
    "enzyme": "3.11.0",
    "enzyme-adapter-react-16": "1.15.2",
    "enzyme-to-json": "^3.6.1",
    "eslint": "6.8.0",
    "eslint-config-prettier": "^6.12.0",
    "eslint-plugin-jest": "23.6.0",
    "eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y": "6.2.3",
    "eslint-plugin-prettier": "^3.1.4",
    "eslint-plugin-react": "7.18.3",
    "eslint-plugin-react-hooks": "2.3.0",
    "fs-extra": "^9.0.0",
    "gulp": "4.0.2",
    "gulp-replace": "^1.0.0",
    "husky": "^4.3.0",
    "inquirer": "^7.1.0",
    "jest": "26.6.3",
    "jest-emotion": "^10.0.32",
    "jest-extended": "^0.11.5",
    "jest-junit": "^10.0.0",
    "lingo-sdk": "^0.1.2",
    "lint-staged": "^10.4.0",
    "luxon": "^1.25.0",
    "mini-css-extract-plugin": "1.6.0",
    "moment": ">=2.21.0 <2.25.0",
    "node-sass": "^5.0.0",
    "node-sass-json-importer": "^4.3.0",
    "ora": "^4.0.4",
    "prettier": "^2.1.2",
    "raw-loader": "^4.0.2",
    "react-is": "^16.13.1",
    "react-router-dom": "^5.2.0",
    "react-test-renderer": "^16.13.1",
    "resolve-from": "^5.0.0",
    "resolve-url-loader": "^3.1.2",
    "rewire": "^4.0.1",
    "sass-inline-svg": "BambooHR/sass-inline-svg",
    "sass-loader": "12.0.0",
    "style-loader": "^2.0.0",
    "stylelint": "13.1.0",
    "tsc-files": "^1.1.0",
    "typescript": "4.0.3",
    "webpack": "5.38.1",
    "webpack-bundle-analyzer": "4.4.2",
    "webpack-cli": "4.7.0",
    "webpack-merge": "^5.7.3"
}

I'm curious if any of them stand out to you as important diferences @stefan-schweiger

stefan-schweiger commented 3 years ago

@WalterWeidner since I'm using storybook with angular, all of them stand out for me πŸ˜…

shilman commented 3 years ago

Great Caesar's ghost!! I just released https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/releases/tag/v6.3.1 containing PR #15365 that references this issue. Upgrade today to the @latest NPM tag to try it out!

npx sb upgrade
jdelStrother commented 3 years ago

Thanks! Looks good to me

azangru commented 3 years ago

Still seeing "Conflicting values for process.env" 😞 . Upgraded from 6.2.9 to 6.3.4:

image

npc-allanb commented 3 years ago

was still getting error message but ran once with --stats-children appended as suggested in warning message and message disappeared. Now no error message without option appended which is good but doesn't seem right.

dewinterjack commented 3 years ago

We do not have a .env file, we are having an issue with process not being defined. Some of them are inconsistent with build-storybook and running storybook. The issue used to come up as a warning saying conflicting values for process.env but now the warning is gone but the issue is still there. Currently using 6.3.4

csantos-nydig commented 3 years ago

We're seeing this error with 6.3.6.

khats commented 3 years ago

i have updated repository with demo story, there is no warnings in console, but DefinePlugin not working( in demo there is error: "window.FAKE_GLOBAL_FUNCTION is not a function")