Closed steven-pribilinskiy closed 3 years ago
Reproduced in the official Storybook (6.4.0-beta.1 at the moment). https://next--storybookjs.netlify.app/official-storybook/?path=/docs/addons-a11y-basebutton--default
I can confirm, we have the same issue.
Do you a have a reproduction repo you can share? If not, can you create one? See how to create a repro.
The official-storybook
as mentioned by @angry-me above also did not show source for some stories. However I've tracked that down and fixed it in #16259 and I believe it is unrelated to this issue.
Thanks! 🙏
@shilman, I've just checked the Official Storybook again and now that seems to be okay in 6.0.4-beta.5
.
I have the same issue, the screenshot above is running 6.4.0-beta.5
, no source code is displayed when using CSF3
, and controls are not working in Docs
@shilman I've encountered the same issue, in my case with MDX. As I was testing this approach in MDX I thought that it would be something worthwhile to use when documenting the MDX stories with a render function eliminating the need for an external function to render the component and consolidating the story within its construct, providing a better UX in my humble opinion. I've setup reproductions based on the documented frameworks here (see the MDXButton.stories.mdx file for context):
Let me know how best we should proceed on this and I'll adjust accordingly.
Thanks so much for this @jonniebigodes. 🙏
In the React example, here's what I see:
I think this is a bit different from what's described above, since there IS source code available, it's just not the correct source out of the box. However, if a user's source-loader
wasn't set up properly they would see "no code available", so I think it's the same underlying problem.
As an aside, if I set features.modernInlineRender
to true
in main.js
(an experimental feature that we do NOT recommend yet!), I see what I think you'd expect.
I'll try to debug this tomorrow. @tmeasday I'm pretty sure that this is not getting recognized as an "args" story on the first render somehow, and that's the root of it.
Thanks for the repro(s!) @jonniebigodes - so good.
So the issue here is the same as in https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/pull/16037 - there I added this concept of the "rendering" stories that we wait for to emit DOCS_RENDERED
.
We add stories to that list when they are (starting to be) rendered by <Story/>
.
However, in https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/pull/16161, we also added loading behaviour to <Canvas/>
, which means the <Story/>
itself does not render.
I think the fix might be for the "loading" <Canvas/>
to render the <Story/>
with isLoading=true
. Or to register the story itself. Will discuss with @shilman.
Yippee!! I just released https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/releases/tag/v6.4.0-beta.7 containing PR #16280 that references this issue. Upgrade today to the @next
NPM tag to try it out!
npx sb upgrade --prerelease
Closing this issue. Please re-open if you think there's still more to do.
@tmeasday and @shilman you know me, no need to thank whatsoever, glad that I was able to provide some context on this issue and appreciate the follow-up!
When I use the new Story API available in 6.4 the Show code button is not available, instead it says "No code available"
Can be fixed by adding
That is not a good solution as iframe needs a height to be specified
Temporarily switching to the former API:
(it is wrong on the screenshot as there's also a need for
Template.bind({})
)