codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.01 :warning:
Comparison is base (
8edb9e4) 97.14% compared to head (c734cd0) 97.14%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #353 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 97.14% 97.14% -0.01% ========================================== Files 32 31 -1 Lines 2346 2344 -2 ========================================== - Hits 2279 2277 -2 Misses 67 67 ``` [see 1 file with indirect coverage changes](https://codecov.io/gh/stotko/stdgpu/pull/353/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Patrick+Stotko) Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Patrick+Stotko). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Patrick+Stotko):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
The
cmathheader has been part of stdgpu since its initial release. However, it only comprises the implementationabsforfloatvalues. Since the the this functionality is not required for the major parts of the library and the usability is limited, remove the header along with the tests.If some functionality of
cmathfrom the C++ standard becomes relevant in the future, the header can be reintroduced.