Closed cdondrup closed 9 years ago
I know... didn't know how to implement a test for that otherwise I would have :(
Actually, it is a dangerous one: there's two packages in here not covered by the paper, head orientation+warco, and the paper is not "the canonical" one for the UBD.
Currently, I don't care because head orientation sucks, but when I push the next version which will clearly kick ass... I might start caring. Then add the upcoming wheelchair detector to that. So maybe I'll reorganize that into a "if use this, cite that; if use that, cite this, ..." in a future PR.
now, that's a dangerous changeset ;-)