Docker Image for arm64 - Githubissues

TheDogg commented 7 months ago

would it be possible to have a docker image that can run on arm64 processors?

thanks

masonen commented 6 months ago

it is?

masonen commented 6 months ago

Ok. But the ARM image currently is not working @strausmann

Fails with error

time="2023-12-23T21:57:12Z" level=debug msg="Using /data to match uid and gid"
time="2023-12-23T21:57:12Z" level=debug msg="Resolved UID=0 from match path"
time="2023-12-23T21:57:12Z" level=debug msg="Resolved GID=0 from match path"
time="2023-12-23T21:57:12Z" level=fatal msg="Failed to run sub-command" error="fork/exec /opt/bedrock-entry.sh: exec format error"

After some debugging i found that the image digest used (https://hub.docker.com/layers/library/openjdk/22-ea-jdk-slim-bookworm/images/sha256-37867f656e947c1d2fa1e17aab69181c2911c6ad10f4bdfd0a6862a4ed8c7685?context=explore) is bound to their amd64 layer thus breaking the executability on arm. (the arm digest is https://hub.docker.com/layers/library/openjdk/22-ea-jdk-slim-bookworm/images/sha256-f3f34dcfba0e8a00fff69e872318b6b66dfa9152c5afab489799f52ef7134fac?context=explore)

I worked around that by changing the digest in a local docker file for now but it would be great if you could handle the digests for the multi arch build in your build pipeline? Or maybe trust the stability of the tag and simply remove the digest from the image?

If needed i could prepare something here but earliest in jan :)

strausmann commented 6 months ago

@masonen thanks for the hint. I really slept there

https://git.strausmann.de/minecraft/bedrock-connect/-/issues/24

masonen commented 6 months ago

Pulled and run tag 24-arm-image-is-broken, works like charm.

strausmann commented 6 months ago

new stable release is now published.

strausmann / minecraft-bedrock-connect

Docker Image for arm64 #2