Field with resolver (strawberry_django.field(resolver=resolver)) returns incorrect type

[guizesilva]

Describe the Bug

When using strawberry_django.field with resolve in this style,

def resolver(root: "FruitType") -> str:
    return f"{root.id} - {root.name}"

@strawberry_django.type(model=Fruit)
class FruitType:
    id: int
    name: str
    id_name: str = strawberry_django.field(resolver=resolver)

the type returned is going to be StrawberryDjangoField instead of str. This happens only for resolvers with arguments. When the resolver uses no arguments, the correct type is returned.

This is similar to this issue reported at strawberry-graphql/strawberry

As proposed by the above issue, a fix could be replacing this (https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry-graphql-django/blob/main/strawberry_django/fields/field.py#L387):

@overload
def field(
    *,
    ...
    resolver: Callable[[], _T],
    ...
) -> _T: ...

for this

@overload
def field(
    *,
    ...
    resolver: Callable[..., _T],
    ...
) -> _T: ...

Another options is to take the same approach used by strawberry here

_RESOLVER_TYPE = Union[
    StrawberryResolver[T],
    Callable[..., T],
    Callable[..., Coroutine[T, Any, Any]],
    Callable[..., Awaitable[T]],
    "staticmethod[Any, T]",
    "classmethod[Any, Any, T]",
]

@overload
def field(
    *,
    ...
    resolver: _RESOLVER_TYPE[T],
    ...
) -> _T: ...

System Information

• Operating system: macOS Sonoma 14.1
• Strawberry version (if applicable): not applicable

Additional Context

I can create a PR with the preferred solution if this is indeed an issue.

Upvote & Fund

• We're using Polar.sh so you can upvote and help fund this issue.
• We receive the funding once the issue is completed & confirmed by you.
• Thank you in advance for helping prioritize & fund our backlog.

[bellini666]

Hey @guizesilva ,

Feel free to create the PR for that :)

And I think the best option is to use the same approach as strawberry does