Add support for using raw Python enum types in schema

[nrbnlulu]

Description

Types of Changes

• [ ] Core
• [ ] Bugfix
• [ ] New feature
• [ ] Enhancement/optimization
• [ ] Documentation

Issues Fixed or Closed by This PR

fix #3543

Checklist

• [ ] My code follows the code style of this project.
• [ ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
• [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• [ ] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes.
• [ ] I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

Summary by Sourcery

Add support for using raw Python enum types in schemas, enabling the use of enums without @strawberry.enum decoration. Fix issue #3543 and update tests to cover the new functionality. Document the changes in RELEASE.md.

New Features:

• Add support for using raw Python enum types in schemas, allowing enums that are not decorated with @strawberry.enum to be used.

Bug Fixes:

• Fix issue #3543 by allowing the use of non-decorated enum types in schemas.

Documentation:

• Add a new section in RELEASE.md documenting the support for using raw Python enum types in schemas.

Tests:

• Add tests to verify the default implementation of enum, str enum, and int enum types in schemas.

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request adds support for using raw Python enum types in Strawberry schemas without requiring the @strawberry.enum decorator. The changes primarily affect the enum handling in the Strawberry library, allowing for more flexible use of enum types from external sources.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added support for raw Python enum types in schemas	Removed the test case that raised an error for non-decorated enums Added new test cases for default enum, StrEnum, and IntEnum implementations Modified the create_enum method to use strawberry_enum for non-decorated enums instead of raising an error	tests/enums/test_enum.py strawberry/annotation.py
Added release notes for the new feature	Created a new RELEASE.md file Described the new functionality and provided an example use case	RELEASE.md

---

Tips

- Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.

[botberry]

Thanks for adding the RELEASE.md file!

Here's a preview of the changelog:

---

This release adds support for using raw Python enum types in your schema (enums that are not decorated with @strawberry.enum)

This is useful if you have enum types from other places in your code that you want to use in strawberry. i.e

# somewhere.py
from enum import Enum

class AnimalKind(Enum):
    AXOLOTL, CAPYBARA = range(2)

# gql/animals
from somewhere import AnimalKind

@strawberry.type
class AnimalType:
    kind: AnimalKind

Here's the tweet text:

🆕 Release (next) is out! Thanks to ניר for the PR 👏

Get it here 👉 https://strawberry.rocks/release/(next)

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 96.94%. Comparing base (596461b) to head (d0a0a84). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #3639 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 96.66% 96.94% +0.27% ========================================== Files 504 503 -1 Lines 33448 33457 +9 Branches 5600 5602 +2 ========================================== + Hits 32333 32434 +101 + Misses 881 791 -90 + Partials 234 232 -2 ```

[codspeed-hq[bot]]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3639 will not alter performance

_{Comparing nrbnlulu:default-enums (d0a0a84) with main (596461b)}

Summary

✅ 15 untouched benchmarks

[patrick91]

@erikwrede you mean the failing test, right?

[erikwrede]

@patrick91 i just meant the wrong file @nrbnlulu mentioned but looks good now 😊