Closed rugk closed 5 years ago
I intend to make this as the next step after #338
At this moment my main block is a lack of three photos that are
And three images are required
As for a "usual leaves" you could also use:
In real pictures:
As for needles:
Or just make it yourself. I could clearly also take some pictures if needed.
I really like cliparts idea, that is a new idea. Some nice broadleaved, just https://openclipart.org/search/?query=pine finds some needles.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Branched_juniper_twig_with_shots.jpg would be even better - unfortunately it requires matching broadleaved on black baground
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tabak_Burley-Jupiter.JPG - I found no evidence that CC-BY-SA 3 is usable in GPL v3 project and strong indication that it is not. completely unfit due to background
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Playing_with_water,_light_and_leaves_(Fagus_sylvatica).JPG - I considered this one but once in small size it is not very readable. Also, I wanted to keep broad/needle without any spurious differences like colour (red/green)/state (dying/on tree). completely unfit due to color
Thanks for clipart icons idea, this is really promising - especially with readability better than photo at low resolution. The last thing is to check whatever openclipart.org is trustworthy on topic of licenses.
EDIT: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_from_openclipart.org strongly indicates that they are OK.
And now I found also some promising reserve photos at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tree?uselang=pl#Foliage_.2F_Feuillage
Did you see the trees/leaves in twemoji and emojione 2 icon sets?
unfortunately it requires matching broadleaved on black baground
It's easy to edit it, but could still leave some traces of a black background.
I found no evidence that CC-BY-SA 3 is usable in GPL v3 project and strong indication that it is not.
As it is media in contrast to code, I think it works. Actually CC-BY-SA is quite the "synonym" to GPLv3. Many games like 0AD or so use CC-BY-SA with a GPL license IIRC.
The last thing is to check whatever openclipart.org is trustworthy on topic of licenses.
Public domain/CC0. Look here: https://openclipart.org/share You won't find any lower criteria. (And I would not suggest images with bad licenses.)
Did you see the trees/leaves in twemoji and emojione 2 icon sets?
Why not have a general look: http://emojipedia.org/fallen-leaf/ (I also like the EmojiOne 3 version. When not using SVG they are under a free license)
And now I found also some promising reserve photos at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tree?uselang=pl#Foliage_.2F_Feuillage
:+1:
License of EmojiOne 3 is not compatible. Only twemoji (Twitter) and EmojiOne 2 are.
Ah, right, because of -NC… Okay, but v2 is not bad either…
Any news? Is it really so hard to decide on two pictures?
@rugk No, it is because it is a hobby project and as far as StreetComplete goes I was busy with making my own map style for use in StreetComplete what turned out to require for example https://github.com/tilezen/vector-datasource/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Amatkoniecz+is%3Aclosed
Cool
Oh, cool. :+1: So you are working on https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/183. (Always a good idea to leave a note in the issue thee, so no one else starts working in the meantime…)
Good collection of SVG icons is https://github.com/Xaviju/inkscape-open-symbols
Values to offer in case of natural=tree
are:
leaf_type=broadleaved
for broad leaved trees. This includes palm trees which might need to be emphasized or even offered as an extra option, mapping to the same value, to prevent confusion and people tagging palm trees as needle leaved.leaf_type=needleleaved
for needle leaved trees, This includes conifers which might need to be emphasized or even offered as an extra option, mapping to the same value, to prevent confusion and people tagging conifers as broad leaved.Improved icon and picture suggestions:
Note that leaf_type=mixed
does not apply to trees and is only used in combination with landuse=*
and natural=scrub
and barrier=hedge
. Please, support the latter two as well. Note mixed
should not be offered for natural=tree
.
Also leaf_type=leafless
for cacti is not used on natural=tree
, as these plants are tree-like, but not trees and only used in landuse=*
. There, use as icon and picture:
Do not process natural=tree_row
as the individual trees in the row can differ. Process only the nodes of natural=tree_row
. Only when all nodes are tagged for leaf_cycle
, natural=tree_row
can automatically get a value which may include leaf_type=mixed
. Per haps this is something for a bot?
Sometimes, trees are dead and have no leaves for the user to identify them. Any suggestions what to do with that? A tree can have an end date, but the moment of survey is not the date to use there.
In summary, after checking all with taginfo only allowed options (next to: don't know/unknown/not filled out/not set):
leaf_type= |
broadleaved |
needleleaved |
mixed |
leafless |
---|---|---|---|---|
natural=tree |
+ | + | - | - |
natural=tree_row |
+ | + | + | - |
natural=wood |
+ | + | + | - |
landuse=forest |
+ | + | + | - |
natural=scrub |
+ | + | + | + |
barrier=hedge |
+ | + | + | + |
All other landuse
, natural
, barrier
, et cetera do not need to be queried.
(done updating the post above)
Perhaps note the user that a single pine tree in a huge forest doesn't make the forest mixed.
The general problem I see with tagging forests via survey is that it is usually a large area.
Okay, agree to omit natural=wood
and landuse=forest
from this query.
So only https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/83? I would be fine with that.
no, forget that one for now. the table in this post is what is relevant, minus the two omissions
so only
leaf_type= |
broadleaved |
needleleaved |
mixed |
leafless |
---|---|---|---|---|
natural=tree |
+ | + | - | - |
natural=scrub |
+ | + | + | + |
barrier=hedge |
+ | + | + | + |
I removed also tree_row, as that can be calculated from the trees making the row. Some tree rows are very very long, so not practical to do in a survey with StreetComplete
I removed also tree_row, as that can be calculated from the trees making the row.
IIRC you map either individual trees or natural=tree_row line.
The general problem I see with tagging forests via survey is that it is usually a large area.
I thought that SC would be useful for mapping tiny areas that are easy to survey, hard to map tree type from aerial images and likely to not require splitting.
Is it possible in overpass to get areas below for example 1 square kilometer?
What is needed to move this issue forward?
@matkoniecz Not sure, but it would be possible to calculate and filter that after download in Java code.
@PanderMusubi Someone willing to implement it
natural=scrub and barrier=hedge
Note the title of this issue. I am making second attempt at the PR that will support also natural=wood
as obvious synonym of landuse=forest
, but will not support natural=scrub and barrier=hedge. Primary reason is that separate translations are needed and that for tree covered area answering this quest is much more useful, as there is already some use of this tag.
For hedges it seems to be as useful as backrest quest for benches.
Feel free to create a separate issue for that, especially once this one will be closed.
I am planning to use https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Juniper_needles.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Leaf_of_common_tilia.jpg
Changed to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Whitebark_pine_Pinus_albicaulis_needle_clusters.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Populus_tremuloides_(5002308731).jpg as cropping to square images is required
In case of supporting leaftype=palm: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/2007-02-28(57)_Palm_leaf,_Palmblatt.JPG
In case of supporting leafless: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Saguaro_jul04_38.jpg
With https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nadelnfichtenrp.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Populus_tremuloides_(5002308731).jpg as backup.
Other alternatives: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quercus_robur.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lisc_lipy.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Abies_grandis_5359.JPG
Needle backup: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Norway_Spruce_needle_stomata.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pinus_flexilis_2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:White_fir_new_needles_(4740404721).jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Abies_concolor_8065.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pinus_flexilis_3.jpg
Did you see the trees/leaves in twemoji and emojione 2 icon sets?
Yes, but tree shape may not match leaf type and I see no icons in emojione for broad-leaved/needles distinction.
https://emojipedia.org/twitter/ has long list (better list is welcomed!), maybe I missed something but situation seems the same.
for a potential future search:
https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=Fir%20needles&license=4%2C5%2C9%2C10 https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?language=commons&project=wikimedia&depth=10000&categories=White%20background%0D%0ALeaves%20in%20summer&ns%5B0%5D=1&ns%5B6%5D=1&search_max_results=500&add_image=on&interface_language=en&&doit=
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Leaves_on_white_background https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Conifer_leaves https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Abies https://duckduckgo.com/?q=needles+site%3Acommons.wikimedia.org&t=canonical&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2F2%2F23%2FWhitebark_pine_Pinus_albicaulis_needle_clusters.jpg%2F1098px-Whitebark_pine_Pinus_albicaulis_needle_clusters.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Abies_%C3%97_arnoldiana https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pinus_sylvestris_foliage
The
leaf_type
quest for forests should be easy to answer and always stays the same… And one quest can cover a big area… :smiley: