Closed tapetis closed 2 years ago
What all erroneous changesets linked above have in common is that beforehand the street parking tags were specified for only one side of the way. Afterwards, both sides have the same parking tags.
This bug seems to be related to the following code, which only removes the previous parking tags when they are found to be different from the parking tags chosen by the user (which is not the case):
The following code in this function then additionally specifies the :both
tags.
A good question would also be why many users edit the two sides one after another and not simultaneously. Specifying just one side is only possible since 5bce8c52b5af7462d4e8fa2d606fe802f6664420, which makes this bug in the implementation more visible now.
Nice, so you found the culprit?
A good question would also be why many users edit the two sides one after another and not simultaneously
This was actually a requested feature and I am now using it too, it is very handy. Sometimes you can only see one side of the street from where you are.
Actually yes, but I don't think it's a good idea to just remove all :left
or :right
tags completely and just add new :both
tags. When there are no changes to the already specified side, the previous parking:condition:side
value should not be lost.
Hmm, sounds reasonable. But is this implementable with reasonable complexity?
But would a complicated implementation be a valid justification for potentially deleting correctly entered data? Wouldn't this also lead to problems if in the future this parking:condition:side
data could be entered by StreetComplete itself?
No, it wouldn't be a valid justification. To be honest, I was just trying to sneakily nudge you into looking into the code more in detail so that maybe you would create a PR to fix it :-P Sorry for that. But now that I confessed, would you? Otherwise of course, I'd come around to it of course, as this is a bug that must be fixed.
I can try. So if for one side new parking tags are added while no existing tags of the other, already specified side are changed, no old parking tags should be lost. But once any existing parking tag is changed, all previous parking tags should be deleted for both sides as discussed in #4501?
I guess if either one side is specified with null
or the parking situation did not change for that side, the subtags for that side should not be touched.
The street parking overlay seems to tag ways with duplicated information for
:left
or:right
and:both
. From what I have seen so far, either the:right
or:left
key appears to duplicate the value of the:both
key. I did not find any inconsistent information between these keys.I do not know how to reproduce this issue, but I found many examples of this type of tagging on osmose, which reports this issue as "Too many parking:lane:[side]". Listed below are some ways that now have duplicated
parking:condition
and/orparking:lane
tags after they were edited using StreetComplete:Most of the changesets that introduced this type of tagging were created using v47.1 and v47.2 of StreetComplete.