Closed Helium314 closed 1 year ago
Is it some service platform in yards? In such case I would say that public_transport = platform
is wrong, like putting it on freight train loading dock or train washing area would be.
Not sure, it's quite narrow and barely suitable for other uses than accessing the other end of the train. The tracks next to the platform are definitely not part of the normal subway connections (and actually do have service=yard
tag)
Changed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130861549 - looks like one more victim of iD editor asking to blindly "upgrade" tags (which got a bit better since that time)
Though maybe railway=platform
still triggers the quest? I admit that I have not checked this.
And https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=platform?uselang=en is not really clear are only public transport platforms supposed to be tagged with this - which ideally would be clarified first before changing SC.
I started https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:railway%3Dplatform#All_railway_platforms
Though maybe
railway=platform
still triggers the quest? I admit that I have not checked this.
It's only
public_transport = platform
or (highway = bus_stop and public_transport != stop_position)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219448424 on https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahnstrecke_Ludwigshafen_Hbf%E2%80%93Ludwigshafen_BASF
is a real platform where you are only able to leave the platform if you are an employee of BASF.
Still, there is a good chance that it can be mappable without visiting it and this is so rare that just hiding it should be fine...
Though I guess that tested PR adding access filtering would be fine.
I get the shelter / tactile paving / lit / ... quests for a platform that is inaccessible to normal people and not part of a regular stop: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245311267 Should SC respect the
access=private
here and not ask? Or is this some tagging issue, becausepublic_transport
could be interpreted as conflicting withaccess=private