Closed matryer closed 11 years ago
I think this is just fine the way it is. The package name is "stretchr" even though it is part of the "sdk-go" repository. It works just fine in the tools for which I've used it.
Our docs reflect the "stretchr" package name, so that shouldn't be a problem.
I believe this is fine and this issue should be closed. Do you agree?
Yes
On 21 Mar 2013, at 19:10, Tyler notifications@github.com wrote:
I believe this is fine and this issue should be closed. Do you agree?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Closing
Installing the Go SDK should be a great experience, consider what impact the project name has on
go get
and rename as appropriate.Consider:
github.com/stretchrcom/stretchrgo
github.com/stretchrcom/stretchr
github.com/stretchrcom/go-sdk
Also - what impact will this have on
import
statements within code?Do we include a subfolder for easy package imports?
i.e.
So the code can be keyed off
stretchr
without having to name it directly.api
package? Should that be renamed tostretchrapi
so people don't writeapi.Something
in their code and have no idea whichapi
they're referring to?