Open dotlogix opened 1 year ago
The toolkit represents a new concept, and I would not add anything to the Stride Docs referencing the toolkit, at least until the toolkit has a stable release. Eventually, the toolkit docs might be merged with Stride Docs in the future.
This implies that any content regarding mesh instancing would be a valuable addition to the Stride Docs, provided it does not reference the toolkit yet. You're welcome to create as much content as you wish; starting with a manual that includes examples might be a good approach. If you're interested in creating a step-by-step series which you believe would fit well in a tutorial section, that's also an option.
Concerning the toolkit manual and tutorials, of course, any additional content is welcome.
Cross-referencing between the manual and tutorials, and vice versa, is highly encouraged, including references to the Stride Docs.
Let me know if I've addressed your query :)
So basically what you are saying the better place would be to propose this in the Stride Repo? I do not plan to extend the Instancing just create a tutorial how to use it that's why I am not sure if the toolkit is the right place for it :)
Hey there I noticed the stride docs for mesh instancing are lacking a lot so I wonder if the community toolit would be a good place to add a proper example.
My idea would be sth in the style of the MeshBuilder tutorial I made. A bit of background and a simple example in a tutorial style.
Then add some more advanced versions in an example.
Would this be a good fit for this project or should I propose sth like this to the Stride Repo first?