This partly reverts strongloop/strong-runner#11, effectively, where you inject the channel into the runner constructors. That doesn't work well with the new API. We could push a request function in as an option, that would work better.
I reworked to use the patching of Runner approach again, which seems to work fine, though your comment on the runner PR seems to indicate that there was a problem. What was it?
I haven't run docker (or the unit tests) with this change, but I did deploy to sl-pm, and send the set-size command to the running instance, so it passes a smoke test.
I'd like some more comment before continuing.
connected to strongloop-internal/scrum-nodeops#775
/to @rmg
This partly reverts strongloop/strong-runner#11, effectively, where you inject the channel into the runner constructors. That doesn't work well with the new API. We could push a
request
function in as an option, that would work better.I reworked to use the patching of Runner approach again, which seems to work fine, though your comment on the runner PR seems to indicate that there was a problem. What was it?
I haven't run docker (or the unit tests) with this change, but I did deploy to sl-pm, and send the set-size command to the running instance, so it passes a smoke test.
I'd like some more comment before continuing.
connected to strongloop-internal/scrum-nodeops#775