Closed davidcheung closed 8 years ago
@bajtos PTAL
@davidcheung I added two commits improving release notes, PTAL 751e708, 40e3d04. Feel free to squash them into your commit and dropping my authorship along the way.
@davidcheung reviewed.
@bajtos PTAL again
Looks mostly good, I left two more comments to address.
Thanks @bajtos! I have addressed your comments PTAL
One nitpick, the rest LGTM. No further review is necessary.
@davidcheung this depends on https://github.com/strongloop/strong-error-handler/pull/11, doesn't it? Please wait with landing this patch until that required PR is landed first and CI builds are green on our Jenkins. (The jobs on Travis will keep failing because strong-error-handler is not published to npmjs.org yet.)
yes what should i do with the strong-error-handler
version on package.json?
@davidcheung this depends on strongloop/strong-error-handler#11, doesn't it? Please wait with landing this patch until that required PR is landed first and CI builds are green on our Jenkins. (The jobs on Travis will keep failing because strong-error-handler is not published to npmjs.org yet.)
yes what should i do with the strong-error-handler version on package.json?
Ah, I overlooked that line, please reset it to ^1.0.0
. I'll release 1.0.0
when your strong-error-handler pull request is landed.
Please do not merge this yet, my loopback-core module is failing locally but the ci passed will probably need to submit another PR to loopback core before this should be merged.
@slnode test please
should land with https://github.com/strongloop/loopback/pull/2375 when ready
@davidcheung could you please add a note into release notes that error.status
property is no longer available and clients should use error.statusCode
instead?
Placeholder: https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-datasource-juggler/blob/b039b51610b5ad14b5abdc5bb9e798baa7c70588/lib/dao.js#L1199
is still using error.status
LGTM
@davidcheung Did this patch pass CI? Does this patch require loopback-PR#2375? The reason I'm asking is my PR in loopback#2316 was passing, but it fails with lots of failures now with this commit in strong-remoting
; I assume loopback-PR#2375 needs to be landed to fix these failures?
Thanks!
@Amir-61 both PRs depend on each other to pass, I'm currently waiting for CI to run for loopback-PR#2375, once i merge that both sides should pass
Using new strong-error-handler for rest-adapter
connect to https://github.com/strongloop-internal/scrum-loopback/issues/852