When a relationship technology contains a longer string (e.g. the name or version of API instead of simple "REST API" or "C API"), the view gets distorted by the extensive width of relationship text boxes:
It seems the reason is the technology string does not follow the width style property of the relationships. It seems this could be easily fixed by adding breakText() function to the technology string processing:
The only workaround I'm aware of is adding line breaks (\n) manually to the technology strings in the model description. However, this is hard to maintain when changing styles in the views.
Would it be OK to make technology strings obey the relationship width property?
Priority
I'm willing to add this feature myself and raise a PR (please confirm approach first)
Description
When a relationship technology contains a longer string (e.g. the name or version of API instead of simple "REST API" or "C API"), the view gets distorted by the extensive width of relationship text boxes:
It seems the reason is the technology string does not follow the
widthstyle property of the relationships. It seems this could be easily fixed by addingbreakText()function to the technology string processing:https://github.com/structurizr/java/blob/f5780f2e0c2a95cec314771bd5d8baf022f129b3/structurizr-export/src/main/java/com/structurizr/export/dot/DOTExporter.java#L312
The only workaround I'm aware of is adding line breaks (
\n) manually to the technology strings in the model description. However, this is hard to maintain when changing styles in the views.Would it be OK to make technology strings obey the relationship
widthproperty?Priority
I'm willing to add this feature myself and raise a PR (please confirm approach first)
More information
No response