Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Ouch, good catch!
For couchbase I agree that FailureMode.Redistribute is the correct choice.
For memcached though I'd say FailureMode.Cancel should be used, so that msm can
kick in with its redistribution (I wonder why this was not covered before).
What do you think?
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 1 Jul 2013 at 3:40
i'm not using memcached but i think it is not a good idea to cancel the whole
operation. if you got multiple memcached instances, on each instance the
session is stored. if one instance goes down, i think it is a better idea to
redistribute the operation to the running one
Original comment by hajo.kli...@gmail.com
on 2 Jul 2013 at 3:16
Fixed, pull request is merged.
I also checked the failure mode for memcached connections and it's in fact set
to Cancel already (in msm specific connection factories).
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 24 Aug 2013 at 10:22
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 20 Dec 2013 at 10:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
hajo.kli...@gmail.com
on 1 Jul 2013 at 3:17