(as e.g mc_chroma is using the sps to determine
picture properties, like pic_width_in_luma_samples and pic_height_in_luma_samples, I think this is
more correct.
This PR is for discussion. (See #345.)
It makes the failures go away, but that does not mean it's correct :)
The following poc will be stop failing if (only) this patch is applied:
poc2 #336 - CVE-2022-43238
poc4 #338 - CVE-2022-43241
poc6-1, poc6-2 #340 - CVE-2022-43242
poc7-1, poc7-2 #341 - CVE-2022-43239
poc8-1 #342 - CVE-2022-43244
poc9-3 #343 - CVE-2022-43236
poc10-2, poc10-3 #344 - CVE-2022-43237
poc16 #350
poc19 #353
The following are still failing if only this patch is applied, but they stop failing if #365 is applied as well, but will still fail with ONLY #365 applied (IOW, both are needed)
poc1 #335 - CVE-2022-43240
poc3 #337 - CVE-2022-43235
poc5 #339 - CVE-2022-43243
poc9-1,poc9-2, poc9-4 #343 - CVE-2022-43236
poc14 #348 - CVE-2022-43253
poc15 #349 - CVE-2022-43248
poc17-1, poc17-2 #351
poc18 #352 - CVE-2022-43245
Edit: poc17-x and poc-18 is NOT fixed with that. Sorry for the confusion.
(as e.g mc_chroma is using the sps to determine picture properties, like pic_width_in_luma_samples and pic_height_in_luma_samples, I think this is more correct.
This PR is for discussion. (See #345.) It makes the failures go away, but that does not mean it's correct :)
The following poc will be stop failing if (only) this patch is applied:
The following are still failing if only this patch is applied, but they stop failing if #365 is applied as well, but will still fail with ONLY #365 applied (IOW, both are needed)
poc15 #349 - CVE-2022-43248
poc17-1, poc17-2 #351Edit: poc17-x and poc-18 is NOT fixed with that. Sorry for the confusion.