Closed hugo-vrijswijk closed 5 years ago
We could say the Linq mutator is the language specific implementation of the Method expression mutator. That way the method expression mutator is indeed implemented for .Net. Otherwise we should add the Linq mutator seperately. But this would be unlogical since Linq is .Net specific.
Merge whenever you want :+1:
Otherwise we should add the Linq mutator seperately. But this would be unlogical since Linq is .Net specific.
As the LINQ mutators are fairly similar to some that are there now I think it'd make sense to include them. I'll change them to link to each implementation
@richardwerkman I've added the same list of LINQ mutators as in the Stryker.NET readme. If you agree we can merge I think
Yes this looks good! Merging is ok for me :+1:
Closes #11
Renamed
Array declarator literal
toArray Declaration
.Method Expression
is set to unsupported for Stryker.NET, but it does support LINQ mutators, so we might want to change it, @richardwerkman ?I've also ordered the categories alphabetically