I was expecting to have all the crates in tables, not just the ones I listed for demonstration. Having all crates in a table will make the stars/last commit badges more legible, plus there will be no duplication.
For crates that don't have a UNIX or "standard" tool, there can be a separate table that has a description column instead of a UNIX column.
Also, we should probably decide whether we want the crate name or the command in the table. Currently, the column contains commands, but it would probably be better to have the crate name.
I was expecting to have all the crates in tables, not just the ones I listed for demonstration. Having all crates in a table will make the stars/last commit badges more legible, plus there will be no duplication. For crates that don't have a UNIX or "standard" tool, there can be a separate table that has a description column instead of a UNIX column.
Also, we should probably decide whether we want the crate name or the command in the table. Currently, the column contains commands, but it would probably be better to have the crate name.