Closed wlz0726 closed 7 years ago
Dear Lizhong,
if you have followed my recommended processing, you should have used a mappability mask that should have masked out repeat-regions anyway.
Stephan
On 27 Dec 2016, at 06:44, Lizhong Wang notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi Stephan,
I'm wondering if the results make sense when I remove repeatmask region to reduce the memory consumption and running time. I mainly want to estimate the relative cross coalescence rate. The results changed a little bit the postion of rccr=0.5.
test plot: masked (orange) vs default (green) https://camo.githubusercontent.com/5b6901418dcc4062c5684f078ce4ccb24c6bef52/687474703a2f2f6f66723976696f75672e626b742e636c6f7564646e2e636f6d2f515132303136313232372d302e706e673f696d616765566965772f322f772f353030 best lizhong
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/stschiff/msmc/issues/26, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAbQmlk-VhdcldIn_3guNsJqb9mHNJbhks5rMKWxgaJpZM4LWC6U.
Thanks for your reply.
Hi Stephan,
I'm wondering if the results make sense when I remove repeatmask region to reduce the memory consumption and running time. I mainly want to estimate the relative cross coalescence rate. The results changed a little bit the postion of rccr=0.5.
test plot: masked (orange) vs default (green)
best lizhong