Keybindings

[bijang]

emacs and vim keybinding; taking the next browser project as an example, emacs-like and vim-like (https://github.com/atlas-engineer/next/blob/master/documents/MANUAL.org#vi-style-bindings) options, of sane defaults, both built in from the outset, (perhaps with some consistancy between projects if that were appropriate to ease the induction for newcomers)

[bijang]

probably of no consequence but for possible interest... https://rabbitictranslator.com/wordpress/index.php/category/keyboard-shortcuts-analysis/ https://phabricator.kde.org/T11520 relatively objective analysis of keybindings, from the perspective of ergonomics mainly. Shortcomings of the analysis, in relation to mahogany, are he predominantly compares non-tiling WM, (working from a KDE developers' perpective, (though does look at i3)); probably limited value for the tiling paradigm and weight of influence of emacs/vim/gnuscreen/etc; but thought it an interesting read and the systematic approach laudable.

[bijang]

Actually looking at the next browser project again and their plans for upcoming 2.0, will include emacs vi and cua bindings

Modes keymap-schemes must now be set with either keymap:make-scheme or define-scheme. Schemes are now first-class objects. Defaults schemes cua, emacs, vi-normal and vi-insert are in the scheme package. Thus it’s enough to complete over scheme: to list them all.

...although its still a work in progress, it is a common lisp based project, could these parts be reused as a library of sorts and adapted into this projects to circumvent developing from scratch or at least to provide a jump start from which to progress