search

stux2000 / plan9front

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/plan9front
0 stars 0 forks source link

upas/marshal attach header #113

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
it would be nice if upas/marshal would implement acme mails
Attach: pseudo headers to allow attachments as an alternative
to specifying them on the command line.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by cinap_le...@felloff.net on 20 Apr 2012 at 4:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Should these changes properly be made against nupas, if we still want that in 
the tree instead of the old upas?

Original comment by stanley....@gmail.com on 20 Apr 2012 at 7:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
maybe? but i'm not using nupas nor is it in 9front.
did nupas change marshal as well? i thought it
mainly improved upas/fs to use a index to not
having to load all mails into memory...

Original comment by cinap_le...@felloff.net on 20 Apr 2012 at 8:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I hadn't diffed them until just now. It looks like nupas' marshal adds support 
for bcc, some changes to pgp interaction, and a few other changes I didn't 
immediately understand. Nupas' upas/fs definitely works better (read: much, 
much faster) with gmail's imap, but also crashes every couple of days.

Original comment by stanley....@gmail.com on 21 Apr 2012 at 3:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
There are some further changes in nupas that cause it to behave differently in 
ways I don't understand. I've stopped using it.

It looks like some headers in the body of the message are already supported. I 
haven't experimented with this yet but I'm willing to try.

Original comment by stanley....@gmail.com on 5 May 2012 at 6:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Revision 2ba97c7c913b adds support for attach: and inline: in the message body.

Original comment by stanley....@gmail.com on 1 Jan 2013 at 2:14