Open nikitabobko opened 5 years ago
But HEAD
isn't a branch.. maybe it could go above the BRANCHES
section & be a location without any children.
@srbs thank you! Your suggestion is even better than my own. For many people I know them use "HEAD branch" very often in other git GUIs and placing it on top level along with BRANCHES is good idea.
@nikitabobko, feel free to modify your title & description if you think my suggested is the route to go. 😃
I think it would be very convenient to have HEAD
in Locations! I wonder why it's not there from the very beginning... This feature is the first in my wait-list.
I usually "ride" with locations hidden.
Some mocked Parent: sha-of-HEAD
attribute could be added, above the commit message prompt (like this prompt above "commited" commits)
I usually "ride" with locations hidden.
It's because it's designed really badly. See: #479
Some mocked Parent: sha-of-HEAD attribute could be added
Well, not sure that it's good design solution. For me it'd look strange
Well, not sure that it's good design solution. For me it'd look strange
I don't think it would look as bad as you may imagine. If I pretend to be a mock designer:
That doesn't look half bad to me, it is UI-consistent, and gets the job done
Forget what I said. It looks ok. It would be nice to have both:
Locations
side bar
Here in
which represents current branch.
Locations
side bar I'd like to seeHEAD
along withBRANCHES
,REMOTES
, ...:How it should work:
Sublime merge
then double click onHEAD
means nothing