This is not correct as pallet prefix can be changed between runtimes?, yet it is hardcoded in the generated code
Here is a plan.
....
Right, forgot about that.
By the way, which part should be backwards compatible? I thougth it was about runtime.description.storage[prefix]
Should "Runtime.getStorage(), Runtime.queryStorage() and friends" try to find a storage by a prefix if there is no pallet? I mean should we create "fake" storages in a runtime description there a prefix will be used as a pallet name?
Right, forgot about that.
By the way, which part should be backwards compatible? I thougth it was about
runtime.description.storage[prefix]Should "
Runtime.getStorage(),Runtime.queryStorage()and friends" try to find a storage by a prefix if there is no pallet? I mean should we create "fake" storages in a runtime description there a prefix will be used as a pallet name?