substance / substance-legacy

Towards open digital publishing
http://substance.io
928 stars 74 forks source link

Discussion Tools #230

Closed michael closed 11 years ago

michael commented 12 years ago

Design options for our Discussion Tool, that contextually displays relevant comments to certain parts of the document.

Classic tabs:

Space efficient bullets:

Requirements:

What do you think?

joweiser commented 12 years ago

I think that strongly depends on your target audience. Space efficient bullets look neat but UX is suffering severely - I don't know what those colors mean, the connection between the tab-button and the tab is lost (indicating which is currently active and that those circles are supposed to be tabs). I'd view comment counts as something optional and thus rather not display them. My suggestion: If there are no comments then don't display the relevant tab.

And I'll vote for the classic tabs.

michael commented 12 years ago

True. It's just some rough interface ideas, that need to be verified. I'm not a designer so it's tough for me to fine-tune the stuff. However, I'm trying to make some good decisions regarding UX-flow.

Regarding colors: There's 3 marker types

Comments are optional, so you can just tag certain text passages as "doubted", without adding a comment. Not displaying a tab if there's no comment is not a idea I think, as there needs to be a way to "add the first comment".

michael commented 12 years ago

Usability testing... soon. :) We're at the early stage of making a good guess.

michael commented 12 years ago

Btw... Alternative UI Sketches appreciated. :)

michael commented 11 years ago

We've got a new layout for this.