Open JGilbert-eLife opened 5 years ago
Could we assume that when an email is provided, that the author is a corresponding author and save that in the XML, but only capture "email" or "not email" in the editor?
@michael
Yes for Érudit.
Could we assume that when an email is provided, that the author is a corresponding author and save that in the XML, but only capture "email" or "not email" in the editor?
This would not work for another journal we are working with for Libero so I think it would not be a good idea to set it up this way. Sorry!
Could we assume that when an email is provided, that the author is a corresponding author and save that in the XML, but only capture "email" or "not email" in the editor?
Could you elaborate on this?
Having an email and being corresponding author is not necessary the same IMO. What is the reasoning behind this?
Note: I personally try to avoid any implicit mechanism. I.e. if 'corresponding author' is a concept, i would prefer an explicit representation in the model.
Having an email and being corresponding author is not necessary the same IMO. What is the reasoning behind this?
The corresponding author is the person readers should contact if they want to ask the authors something about the paper. The other authors may display their email address, but they are not the official contact for the actual paper. Does that make sense?
I agree, not great.
Does that make sense?
Yes.
Understand, let's capture this in two separate fields then. My assumption was based on Erudit's use-case. But makes perfect sense to have emails for a number of authors where only some of them are corresponding authors. Updated the proposal as well to reflect this. See #1269.
Description
An email address associated with an author.
User stories
Author
Production staff
But what if . . . ?
Consideration
XML requirements
Captured using the
email
element, as a child of the appropriatecontrib
element.Group authors may have more than one email address:
Mock ups
Proposal