So currently all tclsh-wrapper commands are in bag-of-procs namespace. There are only so many, the complexity is not insurmountable or anything, but to dip your toe into tclsh-wrapper is swim in it's pool. There are two obvious 8.6 solutions: child namespaces and tcloo.
Although I want to justify this at length, I won't, instead when next you hear from me, I am going to present a tcloo-ified tclsh-wrapper, and we all can discuss it as a proposal. If you prefer to use namespaces, I don't mind at all if this effort is ultimately in vain :)
Hi!
So currently all tclsh-wrapper commands are in bag-of-procs namespace. There are only so many, the complexity is not insurmountable or anything, but to dip your toe into tclsh-wrapper is swim in it's pool. There are two obvious 8.6 solutions: child namespaces and tcloo.
Although I want to justify this at length, I won't, instead when next you hear from me, I am going to present a tcloo-ified tclsh-wrapper, and we all can discuss it as a proposal. If you prefer to use namespaces, I don't mind at all if this effort is ultimately in vain :)