Closed sruenwg closed 6 months ago
I think 1 is good too.
I noticed this might be a bit hard to implement since Twitch clips do not seem to support programmatic controls. I believe Twitcasting and Nicovideo streams also do not support these controls.
It seems then that the only way to pause playback for these videos is to unload the iframe, and there is no way for us to restore the previous state when the user reopens the video. This means we have to go with option 2 (resetting playback state).
On the other hand, we do have access to playback controls for YouTube streams & clips and Twitch streams, meaning we can pause these videos programmatically.
Would you say we should go with option 1 where possible? or would you rather we provide a more consistent experience by going with option 2 everywhere? (I personally prefer the latter due to it being simpler)
What operating system are you using?
Mac
Describe the Bug
The LivestreamDetailsModal continues to play audio from the previous video even after the user opens a new video via the related videos tab.
Steps to reproduce:
I expect the audio from the previous video to be inaudible once the modal opens the next video.
More specifically, I believe a fix for this problem should take into account the user flow where a user opens and plays a video, opens a related video, then clicks ζ»γ to return to the first video. In this flow, I expect either of the two following behaviors:
v1
pauses but its state is stored when the user opens a related videov2
. If the user opensv2
whenv1
has a timestamp of 01:23:45, then when the user returns fromv2
tov1
,v1
is shown to the user paused at the same timestamp 01:23:45.v1
is simply lost when the user opensv2
. Regardless of the timestampv1
has when the user opensv2
, when the user returns fromv2
tov1
,v1
is reloaded from 00:00:00.My preference as a user is definitely option 1 as long as there is no big hit to performance.
Please provide any relevant error logs
No response