Closed quozl closed 5 years ago
Sounds like a better design layout to me. Would not appear to have any real impact on current i18n/L10n one way or the other, but raises the question of improvement. It does make a certain left-to-right (LTR) assumption that may not be true in all languages. I'm not personally familiar enough with right-to-left (RTL) languages to know how they display units. I'm not sure if there are RTL languages that might have different conventions for value/unit or unit/value ordering. I wonder if there is another Linux unit conversion tool known to have good i18n you might peek at to look at their i18n tweaks?
I think the source unit coming before the source value would be great and I agree with you, it's a better layout design and removes the need for the swap button
Hello Sir, I want to work on this issue can you please explain me the exact issue in detail?
Agreed. A better design layout, less confusing and easy to use!
At the moment the activity has;
An alternate design could be;
This would;
Discuss?