[x] objectId_tesim - um ... can't we use id or some other indexing of bare_druid and prefixed_druid ?
[x] new fields - sul-dlss/dor_indexing/pull/17 - populating as of 2/16/24
[x] new field populated 2/21/24
[x] replaced in consuming code (see sul-dlss/dor_indexing_app/issues/1031)
[x] old field no longer indexed after consuming code deployed to prod sul-dlss/dor_indexing/pull/34
[ ] object_label_tesim ? See sul-dlss/argo/issues/4262
[x] source_id_ssim - cleanup after PRs #1038, sul-dlss/argo/pull/4256 and sul-dlss/argo/issues/4194 and #1084
[x] exploded_tag_ssim - cleanup after sul-dlss/argo/pull/4206, sul-dlss/argo/issues/4187
[x] metadata_format_ssim - not used sul-dlss/dor_indexing/pull/20/
[x] metadata_source_ssi vs metadata_source_ssim --see #946 and #947 (done?)
[x] solr_doc["#{prefix}_tag_ssim"] in admintags line 33 ... is this to make the tag searchable? sul_tag_ssim?? -- address with code refactor and better comments
[x] various identifier flavors; besides bare and prefixed for each of druid, barcode, sourceid, folio instance id, previous ils ids, doi ... what else? do we need all these?
Based on looking through indexing code. Before removing any:
Candidates:
cleanup after fixing author search (sul-dlss/argo/issues/4231)used for display in Argo