workflow-archiver prod problem mop up

[ndushay]

• [x] @tallenaz will do timeline writeup for post-mortem
• [x] will transcribe "necessary steps" from whiteboard and put here (prob @tallenaz)

[tallenaz]

• workflow-archiver (gem)

  • [x] cut release v1.3.1 against the merged hotfix PR (count = 600)
  • [x] release notes 1.3.1 (in github)
  • [x] release notes 2.0.1 (in github)
  • [ ] gem needs tests (? - cbeer did some for 2.0.x)
  • [ ] hookups / badges
    • [x] travis (no tests on v1.3.x branch)
    • [x] gemnasium
    • [ ] coveralls (no tests on v1.3.x branch; no coveralls on master)
    • [ ] release (on v1.3.x branch, not master)
    • [ ] rubocop (on master, not v1.3.x branch)
  • [ ] works from master in deployable state
    • [ ] oracle config for sequel
    • [ ] faraday config
    • [ ] what else?
  • [ ] devopsdocs
  • [x] README
  • [x] LICENSE

• workflow-archiver-job

  • [x] issue a PR against master from the deployable branch
  • [x] use versioned gem (1.3.1)
  • [x] do versioned, tagged release against master for merged PR above
    • [x] release notes 2.0.0 (in github)
  • [ ] needs tests
  • [ ] hookups / badges
    • [x] travis (but no tests)
    • [x] gemnasium
    • [ ] coveralls (no tests)
    • [x] release
    • [ ] rubocop
  • [ ] devopsdocs
  • [x] README
  • [x] LICENSE
  • [ ] 1 open PR to add honeybadger
  • [x] use DLSS standard cap deploy names
  • [x] update travis to rvm in use in production

• surface to infrastructure team mgmt

  • [ ] non-rails, non-gems -- are they in patch parties; are they deployed when changes are made.
    • e.g. robots, workflow-archiver-job, etc.
  • [ ] for workflow-archiver-job
    • should this just be a stored proc in the db??
    • should it be oracle?
    • should it live on workflow services boxes (as deploy recipes orign had it)
    • should it be addressed sooner than SDR3?
  • [ ] how can we surface (and thus prioritize):
  • [ ] changes not deployed (quimby?)
  • [ ] no test coverage / poor test coverage: quimby?
  • [ ] priority of migrating from non-rails to rails for standardization / maintainability