Closed cbeer closed 4 months ago
Also I think there might be a problem with the call numbers displaying on this page. Looks like there are repeats which I think isn't quite right. http://localhost:3000/patron_requests/new?instance_hrid=387559&origin_location_code=SAL3-STACKS&step=select
I'm confused by what I'm seeing in folio-test (but not folio-prod?). It looks like the item says it's bound-with itself?
It looks like this is a FOLIO model change libsys made recently: https://github.com/sul-dlss/folio-tasks/issues/304
I'm not sure I understand what's going on, but it seems safe enough to just make sure we don't have duplicated items and hope for the best? (6bfd9e7)
Well that is super weird and not what was there originally but yeah I agree making sure the ids are uniq is probably for the best. I remember we had to do that in the original code for reasons I can't remember.
Original specs on this had the language as This item is bound and shelved with:
but it has been updated to This item is bound and shelved by:
. Was this purposeful?
~Sorting is off in http://localhost:3000/patron_requests/new?instance_hrid=387559&origin_location_code=SAL3-STACKS&step=select (A 1.34 87 is being added to the end. Probably because this is the bound with).~ (This is an enumeration problem from graphql)
Spacing is a little weird in http://localhost:3000/patron_requests/new?instance_hrid=2969234&origin_location_code=SAL3-STACKS
A couple concerns above that could be addressed with this PR or another.
Original specs on this had the language as This item is bound and shelved with: but it has been updated to This item is bound and shelved by:. Was this purposeful?
I was going off the figmas. I know we went back and forth on what to call this, but I'm not sure what/where the latest decision is. Maybe https://github.com/sul-dlss/sul-requests/issues/1446#issuecomment-1979739635?
Spacing is a little weird I've tweaked the call number wrapping (assuming that's the spacing problem you're noting?)
Figmas were probably correct. And yes. That is the spacing problem I was referring to.
and introduce
Folio::HoldingsRecord
to match FOLIO data structures (and give us a consistent way to get at the normal + bound-with items).