Report which descriptors support binary mask to extract features

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago


Please, report which descriptors are able to work with binary masks. 
Currently, the only way to know whether a descriptor supports a mask or not is 
if you look at the source code.

A wiki page could be provided to describe which descriptors support masks and 
which don't.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by patricia...@gmail.com on 25 Oct 2012 at 5:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Maybe this should/could even be a call in the Extractor command line utility.
The wiki (as docu always) may be outdated, the CLI could always report the 
coded capabilities.

Original comment by franz.graf on 31 Oct 2012 at 9:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

This issue was closed by revision c2970bcd9874.

Original comment by franz.graf on 10 Nov 2012 at 9:45

Changed state: Fixed

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

integrated in v1.0.0 branch:

java -cp target\JFeatureLib.jar de.lmu.ifi.dbs.jfeaturelib.utils.Extractor 
--list-capabilities
CEDD           : [NoChanges, DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_32, DOES_RGB]
FCTH           : [NoChanges, DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_RGB]
FuzzyHistogram : [NoChanges, DOES_8C, DOES_RGB]
Gabor          : [NoChanges, DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_RGB]
Haralick       : [NoChanges, DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_RGB]
Histogram      : [Masking, NoChanges, DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_RGB]
JCD            : [NoChanges, DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_RGB]
Moments        : [DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_16, DOES_RGB]
PHOG           : [Masking, DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_16, DOES_32]
SURF           : [NoChanges, DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_RGB]
Sift           : [DOES_8G]
Tamura         : [NoChanges, DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_RGB]
Thumbnail      : [NoChanges, DOES_8G, DOES_8C, DOES_RGB]

Original comment by franz.graf on 10 Nov 2012 at 10:36

sumit3203 / jfeaturelib

Report which descriptors support binary mask to extract features #19