I don't know if this is an issue or not, but why are there duplicate mappings for glyphs in the BDF fonts?
For example, in TamzenForPowerline10x20r.bdf, U+00A3 is mapped to both codepoint 163 and codepoint 30. U+00B0 is mapped to codepoint 176 and codepoint 7.
I don't know if this is an issue or not, but why are there duplicate mappings for glyphs in the BDF fonts?
For example, in TamzenForPowerline10x20r.bdf, U+00A3 is mapped to both codepoint 163 and codepoint 30. U+00B0 is mapped to codepoint 176 and codepoint 7.
Is there a reason for this?
Thanks.