Open emily878 opened 9 years ago
I don't know what we should be doing with legislative websites that don't provide any actual data. I guess we should assess them anyway, noting that they exist, etc., etc., but that the data isn't machine-readable.
For lack of Open States guidance, here's how I'm defining the core elements.
Legislators
Legislation
There's a lot more that I'd like (vote data, committee/subcommittee dockets, a lot more legislator data points, bill histories, etc.), but I think this is a reasonable minimum model.
Define the essential substantive elements of the core "Legislative Data" dataset. What are the components that it must minimally include? IDo we have a dataset that we could hold up as a model? (Calling @paultag...)