Closed DanRyanIrish closed 6 months ago
ping @ianan
How about legacy_fitter
? :-)
Ah, I see @samaloney. So you suggest not merging this PR and keeping it as is. Then we can create a new fitting
module for the refactored fitting?
Essentially, but happy to merge this PR just with a different name to make it easier during the refactor e.g. support both for while
Perhaps it's easier for backwards compatibility to keep the name as is and then deprecate it once the new fitting
module is ready.
I like the idea of changing it to something generic like legacy_fitter
, purely because of the past confusion in the naming. Since most of the name change has already taken place, and only just, I'm personally not as worried as much about this edit affecting backwards compatibility.
Is this necessary with #137?
PR Description
As described in PR title. Justification is that the package is no longer called
sunxspex
and there's no need for a module to carry the name of the package.