Closed chartpath closed 10 months ago
BTW I just noticed Supabase uses Apache 2.0 for their main release so I figured that would be consistent in terms of choices. There seem to be a few other community projects that use MIT as well.
For more reference on the rationale of why not having a license can be restrictive to contributors, see https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/1720/what-can-i-assume-if-a-publicly-published-project-has-no-license
Hey @chartpath, sorry for the delay on this. This is a good call - we've added the Apache 2.0 license now. I mistakenly thought this thread was an issue and not a PR, so merged the change in a separate PR #52. Sorry about that.
Thanks for the suggestion!
@gregnr Thank you! This will allow me to make a contribution now :)
Currently it would be a copyright violation for community users to modify this repo because it is missing a license.
For comparison, the other popular Supabase GenAI community repo https://github.com/supabase-community/vercel-ai-chatbot is already using the Apache 2.0 license.