Closed jingsam closed 7 months ago
Could you describe a use case for leaving the containers after supabase stop
? I know users with multiple local projects find it confusing to have stopped containers show up in docker ls.
Perhaps it's worth clarifying that the goal of our CLI is not to provide the same interface as docker/kube commands. We don't want to confuse users with the semantic differences between stop, down, apply, etc. If users need that level of control, they can always use the native docker commands instead.
The primary goal of CLI is to give users a single way to start and stop the local development stack.
Link Add a link to the page which needs improvement (if relevant)
Describe the problem
supabase stop
is actually remove all local Supabase containers, not stop them. This is different. Likedocker stop
anddocker rm
,stop
means the containers still exist and we can restart them again,rm
means the containers is gone and we should recreate again.Describe the improvement A clear and concise description of the improvement.
Additional context Add any other context or screenshots that help clarify your question.