response to rpusztai

[GoogleCodeExporter]

rpusztai regarding my post that you deleted: 
I e-mailed the exact same msg to Lee and he did not respond rudely.  

 Below is what I posted to back to Lee.  Just FYI.

Hello Lee -

I am sorry too as I like to get work done, not figure out what is wrong
with a tool.  Your website invites feedback, bad or good, so I gave it.  I
believe that TOO MANY high IQ software engineers fall short when it comes
to making things simple, and thinking about the next guy.   I saw you
worked for Adobe, and I would be surprised if they don't require excellence
in every aspect.  I realize that TinyXML++ is free software, but does that
mean expectations should be lowered?  It is a rhetorical question as I only
wish software engineers would realize that simple is hard and try to strive
for it. Try to think like a Steve Jobs.

Best,

BTW, I posted my comment on the website and received a RUDE response from a
rpusztai.  I am not in any way affiliated with CodeSynthesis.  I posted on
the website so that google etc. could index my comments.   I think that
comments and feedback are important  and help to guide decisions.  I am
starting to work with CodeSynthesis and thus far I think it is a much more
mature and complete solution than TinyXML++, but overkill for my needs.  As
I think you can relate to, something simpler would have been preferred.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by bhar...@gmail.com on 24 Apr 2009 at 8:02

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Please don't use the issue tracker to talk. Use it for issues. You can email
ticpp.project@gmail.com if you want to talk to the developers. Also don't 
bother Lee
with this. He does not have anything to do with TinyXML++, only the core 
TinyXML.

I responded this way because of how blunt _you_ were. If you had real concerns 
and
criticisms that are more then "TinyXML++ sucks in every way" then I would 
listen. But
until there is real constructive comments I have nothing more to say.

Also I did *not* delete any comment you made or post. I just made the issue 
"invalid".

Original comment by rpusz...@gmail.com on 24 Apr 2009 at 2:20

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by rpusz...@gmail.com on 30 Apr 2009 at 1:44

• Changed state: Invalid