Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I found the problem. In Contact.Initialized, calling these functions raises 1GB
RAM;
displayImage = DisplayImage.CreateDefaultImage(Mail);
sceneImage = SceneImage.CreateDefaultImage(Mail);
Original comment by hepha...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2011 at 10:41
This issue was updated by revision r2013.
Original comment by hepha...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2011 at 11:43
Please check out svn and try again.
RAM has reduced to 100KB from 1GB :)
Original comment by hepha...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2011 at 11:47
How many contacts do you have? Did you test on 3.1 and have the same problem?
Original comment by freezing...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2011 at 8:56
About 600 peoples.
3.1 work normally.
Original comment by jarvis.chen66@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2011 at 2:25
Hi, can you try the current trunk version and check whether the problem still
arise?
Original comment by freezing...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2011 at 8:20
Pang,
To repoduce the issue:
- Download beta2 release
- Login with testmsnpsharp@live account (it have about 400 contacts)
- You will see 1GB ram usage.
- Now update svn and login again.
- RAM usage is 35MB.
Anyway, I have just merged into 3.1 stable and Now 3.1 stable saves 150MB RAM
if you have about 500 contacts.
Original comment by hepha...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2011 at 9:53
Hi Ehtem,
I don't think this issue should be closed this fast since the user already
verify the performance for 3.1, I don't know why he say 3.1 works normally. If
he used a modified client (If that client ) that might mean our 4.0 has other
potential memory leak.
Original comment by freezing...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2011 at 10:34
Actually what I want to say is, you make a good fix, but we need the user to
confirm it is the problem because I really not sure what exactly cause it.
Original comment by freezing...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2011 at 10:37
The current trunk version work normally.
Original comment by jarvis.chen66@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2011 at 1:30
ok, good job Ethem :)
Original comment by freezing...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2011 at 8:39
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jarvis.chen66@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2011 at 8:44Attachments: