MVP needs and requirements

[gusaus]

We've been talking with @owocki and @easonchai about using this platform for Quadratic Funding rounds for FundOSS and other open source projects and organizations in the Open Collective ecosystem (https://discover.opencollective.com/). Our plan to take Quadratic Funding to the masses was derailed a bit after learning this platform was no longer supported https://github.com/FUNDOSS/fundoss/issues/42#issuecomment-1689027689

Why not circle back to this opportunity, update the requirements and bounty https://github.com/supermodularxyz/supermodules/issues/1?

As mentioned to @owocki and @easonchai the stakeholders of these programs would most likely support and even contribute but we're not going to take over ownership or maintainership of a platform and funding model we didn't scope out or create.

[tkgshn]

fully agree

[gusaus]

As noted in this FundOSS update https://github.com/FUNDOSS/fundoss/issues/42#issuecomment-1780085000, I feel like we're a developer and project manager away from being able to complete this MVP, which multiple projects, groups, and organizations could then leverage, extend, and support for multiple programs in their ecosystem and the larger Open Collective / Open Source ecosystem.

I'm hoping some of the Open Collective orgs will recognize the wide range of benefits (and cost savings) that would come from a community driven effort https://github.com/FUNDOSS/fundoss/issues/42#issuecomment-1780194177

Still think it will be easier to find skilled talent with knowledge/expertise in these Web3/QF spaces - especially if @owocki and @easonchai could help update the scope and estimate the funds needed to complete what was initially outlined in https://github.com/supermodularxyz/supermodules/issues/1