Open exoego opened 5 years ago
I found using Collection object
as the best way to express" the companion object of the trait Collection
, where Collection
means any class that behaves like that. It's complicated to keep the balance between being realistic and keeping things easy.
Anyway I agree with you that some kind of explanation need to be added.
There are some entries for methods defined in object like Collection.concat and Collection.empty.
I think it might be confusing for new-comers since there is no
Collection
object actually. In reality, such methods are defined not inCollection
but in the specific collection objects, e.g.List.concat
orSet.empty
.I first imagined that each signatures have a note like
but this is not ideal since the signatures requires translations. So I would suggest to add
For methods in trait, such simplification is fine, I think !!