Closed bguil closed 10 months ago
Hello,
I would like to know if it's still a concern ? I like the idea to have the ExtPos as a FEATS, especially if it's what is already done in the two mentioned UD treebanks.
If there is no protest against this, I propose to make the change soon in all SUD native treebanks.
In Grew, ExtPos
feature is declared as a FEATS features (in opam library conll
, version 1.16.0
).
conll
opam update
opam upgrade conll
The 4 French SUD native treebansk have been updated.
In order to modify the already other annotated treebanks, you can apply the following GRS (with the last version of the conll
library!)
rule r {
pattern { N [__MISC__ExtPos] }
commands { N.ExtPos = N.__MISC__ExtPos; del_feat N.__MISC__ExtPos }
}
strat main { Onf (r) }
Apart from the native SUD treebanks, the feature
ExtPos
was adopted by two UD treebanks:UD_English-EWT
andUD_Portuguese-Bosque
.In these two UD corpora, the feature
ExtPos
is put in theFEATS
columns whereas in the SUD native corpora, it is in theMISC
column (and this is the same for the UD converted versions of these corpora).I proposed to follow the UD corpora and to move
ExtPos
fromMISC
toFEATS
in SUD corpora.