Design a Survey for Gathering Information on Open Source Organizations and Projects

[reginankenchor]

Description: Design a comprehensive survey aimed at collecting information that will help users understand academic OSS. The goal is to gather insights into what specific data people want to know when they look at an open-source project or organization, including roles, contributions, project impact, collaboration opportunities, and key contacts.

Key Objectives for the Survey:

• Identify the types of information that users find most valuable (e.g., personnel, roles, funding sources, technical platforms, community engagement).
• Understand how users would prefer to access and organize this information (e.g., searchable directories, visual maps, project timelines).
• Gather insights into which roles or departments in an organization users are most interested in.
• Learn what collaboration or engagement opportunities users want to explore with open-source organizations and projects.
• Identify additional features or challenges users face when navigating the open-source ecosystem.

Expected Outcomes:

• A data-driven survey that focuses on understanding the needs and preferences of the community regarding open source projects and organizations.
• Clarity on what information is most crucial for building a resource that highlights "who is doing what" within an organization or project.
• Improved design and content focus for the organization section, which will be extended to other sections for further improvements.

Action Items:

• Create a set of questions based on the objectives above.
• Review and finalize the survey with feedback from @RichardLitt
• Prepare to distribute the survey to relevant open-source communities and academic partners.

[RichardLitt]

Design a comprehensive survey aimed at collecting information that will help users understand the landscape of open source organizations and projects. The goal is to gather insights into what specific data people want to know when they look at an open-source project or organization, including roles, contributions, project impact, collaboration opportunities, and key contacts.

A key difference: this isn't the landscape of open source orgs and projects, but explicitly academic OSS.

Also, may be worth looking at this: https://investinopen.org/blog/nnouncing-150-000-award-to-ioi-to-advance-understanding-of-the-research-software-ecosystem/. I think their project is slightly different - it's more project focused.

[reginankenchor]

Design a comprehensive survey aimed at collecting information that will help users understand the landscape of open source organizations and projects. The goal is to gather insights into what specific data people want to know when they look at an open-source project or organization, including roles, contributions, project impact, collaboration opportunities, and key contacts.

A key difference: this isn't the landscape of open source orgs and projects, but explicitly academic OSS.

Also, may be worth looking at this: https://investinopen.org/blog/nnouncing-150-000-award-to-ioi-to-advance-understanding-of-the-research-software-ecosystem/. I think their project is slightly different - it's more project focused.

Thank you, I’ve made adjustments to the description. I reviewed the IOI project, and you're right; the two projects are slightly different. Our work adopts a broader approach by examining various entities in academia that work with open-source software—such as organizations, universities, service providers, and funders—offering a more comprehensive map of the open-source ecosystem in academia. In contrast, IOI has a narrower focus, concentrating on research software development and the infrastructure that supports it. Their work emphasizes identifying existing connections, gaps, and vulnerabilities within the research software ecosystem, aiming to improve its sustainability and resilience. Our data collection methods also vary, but we could certainly draw inspiration from IOI’s approach, particularly in identifying key gaps and opportunities. This could help us align better with our goal of creating a resource for navigating the academic open-source ecosystem.

[RichardLitt]

If we want, we can also connect with them directly. I've had a few people from IOI over the years on the SustainOSS podcast, and know a few of the excellent people on the IOI team.

[reginankenchor]

If we want, we can also connect with them directly. I've had a few people from IOI over the years on the SustainOSS podcast, and know a few of the excellent people on the IOI team.

Sure, I like the idea of connecting with them. I think it would be valuable for our work.

[RichardLitt]

Cool. Let's wait until we have a clearer goal and plan for how this would look. :)

[reginankenchor]

Cool. Let's wait until we have a clearer goal and plan for how this would look. :)

Okay.

[reginankenchor]

Hi @RichardLitt, I have added you as a collaborator on the first draft of the survey. Please review it and drop your comments here. Are there any questions you think should be included, removed, or modified? Thank you.

[RichardLitt]

Got it!

[reginankenchor]

Got it!

Okay

[RichardLitt]

Ok, looked over it, and made some edits:

• I trimmed down the intro - it had a lot of content in it, and I think it could be a bit easier to parse;
• I changed "open-source" to "open source" across the document. https://opensource.org/blog/is-open-source-ever-hyphenated
• I've added a few different options to some of the questions.

This survey is a bit long - and I'm not sure how useful it would be. I'm not sure how we would use a data. Do you have a plan for how to interpret the responses and to use them to add more content to the map?

[reginankenchor]

Ok, looked over it, and made some edits:

* I trimmed down the intro - it had a lot of content in it, and I think it could be a bit easier to parse;

* I changed "open-source" to "open source" across the document. https://opensource.org/blog/is-open-source-ever-hyphenated

* I've added a few different options to some of the questions.

This survey is a bit long - and I'm not sure how useful it would be. I'm not sure how we would use a data. Do you have a plan for how to interpret the responses and to use them to add more content to the map?

Thank you, @RichardLitt . Yes, I’ll review the questions and see what we can trim down. My goal is to interpret the responses and identify any missing information to add to our resource.

[RichardLitt]

I don't think that this survey would highlight many more resources, although it may certainly highlight some values people have around what they look for. I think if we're just looking for organizations or foundations, then this should be more targeted at projects people work on, not just what they're looking for.

I'm not sure the academic map should have just projects on it - for instance, dependencies of R - if they're not connected to a foundation, organization, university, or some other entity outside of themselves. Otherwise, we'd just be including all of the dependency tree of science. Do you follow me here?

[reginankenchor]

I don't think that this survey would highlight many more resources, although it may certainly highlight some values people have around what they look for. I think if we're just looking for organizations or foundations, then this should be more targeted at projects people work on, not just what they're looking for.

I'm not sure the academic map should have just projects on it - for instance, dependencies of R - if they're not connected to a foundation, organization, university, or some other entity outside of themselves. Otherwise, we'd just be including all of the dependency tree of science. Do you follow me here?

Yes, I do. What are you proposing?

[RichardLitt]

I think, if we have a survey, it should be based on two things - one, which foundations, orgs, or universities does the responder think related to open source in academia? and two, what would be useful for you to know when looking for other such types of organizations? What would you want listed?

I think separating out these into two sections would help clarify that.

[reginankenchor]

I think, if we have a survey, it should be based on two things - one, which foundations, orgs, or universities does the responder think related to open source in academia? and two, what would be useful for you to know when looking for other such types of organizations? What would you want listed?

I think separating out these into two sections would help clarify that.

I agree with your suggestions. I will adjust the survey to include these two sections. The first question will focus on identifying relevant organizations, while the second question will address information needs.