search

suttacentral / bilara-data

Content for Bilara translation webapp.
https://bilara.suttacentral.net
27 stars 37 forks source link

And even more Vinaya issues #3726

Open brahmali opened 4 weeks ago

brahmali commented 4 weeks ago

From Ven. Nadī (ex-Tracy):

So, html! I’m sure there’s method to the madness, but in case not… The inserted heading in section 3 e.g. 5.5.0 “Male lay followers” appears in larger font than those in sections 4, 8, 12 e.g. 6.2.0 “A monk sending a message”. I see this in the html file:

"pli-tv-kd3:5.5.0": "<h3 class='inserted-heading'>{}</h3>", ... "pli-tv-kd3:6.2.0": "<h5 class='inserted-heading help-heading'>{}</h5>", And comparison with other kds so far, all the inserted headings in [kd1](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd1/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd1undefined) and [kd4](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd4/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd4undefined) are h3.

Kd 4:5.4.13, 5.4.21 html: These are not boldfaced while in [kd2](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd2/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd2undefined) (26.3.6, 26.4.1) they are. Similarly boldfacing and paragraphing differences with Kd 4:5.6.1-5.6.17 vs [kd2:26.6.1](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd2/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd2:26.6.1)-26.7.7.

Solution: follow the Kd 4 pattern for Kd 2.

Kd 4:16.2.4-5 html: these are part of the same paragraph as the previous segment, and the entire paragraph has “rule” formatting. However in [kd19:2.1.8](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd19/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd19:2.1.8)-9, the same two segments are their own paragraph and do not have “rule” format.

Solution: let's follow the structure in Kd 19. The reason is we want the actual rule to stand out, and we do not want too much bold in the text.

Kd 4:16.2.10 html: this is its own paragraph while in [kd19:2.1.11](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd19/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd19:2.1.11) that sentence is in the same segment as the previous text. In both, that sentence still has “kamma” formatting.

Solution: follow pattern in Kd 4, that is, make it it's own paragraph. Then remove kamma formatting on both. Again, we want have formatting strictly for what is a sanghakamma and minimise the use of bold/semibold.

brahmali commented 3 weeks ago

At Kd 12:9.1.26 to 9.1.73 there is a problem with the enumeration of the factors. As it is, it ends with number 108 instead of the correct number which is 93. The list should look like the one at Kd 12:5.1.25 to 5.1.90.