I'm still trying to set up CI builds for swami. It currently fails due to missing libinstpatch. Available distro packages only provide a libinstpatch-1.0.pc, not the new one. This made me thinking whether it really is a good idea to rename the pkgconfig file. Given that glib also uses that strange naming glib-2.0.pc I think it is better to keep the old name of libinstpatch's pkgconfig file. Esp. because the next release of libinstpatch will not introduce any other breaking changes.
I'm still trying to set up CI builds for swami. It currently fails due to missing libinstpatch. Available distro packages only provide a libinstpatch-1.0.pc, not the new one. This made me thinking whether it really is a good idea to rename the pkgconfig file. Given that glib also uses that strange naming
glib-2.0.pcI think it is better to keep the old name of libinstpatch's pkgconfig file. Esp. because the next release of libinstpatch will not introduce any other breaking changes.